Skip to content

Employment

Employment law in the UK changed dramatically in 2025. These commands help you check whether employment contracts comply with the latest legislation -- including unfair dismissal from day one, flexible working rights, and the new zero-hours protections.

Three commands for employment contracts, IR35 determinations, and freelancer contract reviews.

Employment review (broadsheet rebrand) — four agents in parallel

Plate I — the broadsheet rebrand.

Four parallel agents review employment contracts simultaneously

Plate I.a — the original, kept for reference.

Why use this? You are hiring someone, or you have been offered a job, and you want to make sure the contract is legally compliant and fair. This is especially important since the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduced day-one unfair dismissal rights and other major changes.

Launches 4 parallel agents to produce a comprehensive employment document review with an ERA 2025 compliance dashboard.

Syntax

bash
/legal employment <file>

What it does

  1. Ingestion: Classifies the document (employment contract, offer letter, settlement agreement, policy document, handbook extract) and extracts metadata (employer, employee, role, salary, notice periods, probation).
  2. Parallel analysis: Launches four equal-weight (25% each) subagents:
AgentRole
legal-employment-contractAnalyses every clause against UK employment legislation, verifies written particulars compliance, assesses restrictive covenants, performs ERA 2025 impact assessment
legal-employment-rightsVerifies all 11 statutory employment rights: day-one unfair dismissal, SSP, flexible working, family leave, whistleblowing, working time, holiday, NMW/NLW, pension, tribunal time limits, zero-hours protections
legal-employment-discriminationScans every clause against all 9 protected characteristics, assesses harassment policy adequacy, evaluates equal pay provisions, identifies indirect discrimination risk
legal-employment-obligationsExtracts all obligations, maps key dates, builds operational timeline, calculates financial exposure on termination, assesses restrictive covenant enforceability
  1. Aggregation: Produces Employment Review Score (0--100) with grade A+ to F.

Key legislation

StatuteWhat it covers
Employment Rights Act 2025Day-one unfair dismissal, probation framework, SSP from day one, flexible working, zero-hours protections, third-party harassment duty, extended tribunal time limits
Equality Act 20109 protected characteristics, harassment (ss.26--27), equal pay (ss.64--80), pay secrecy (s.77), preventative duty (s.40A)
Working Time Regulations 1998Maximum 48-hour week, rest breaks, holiday entitlement
National Minimum Wage Act 1998Minimum pay rates by age band

Output sections

  • Employment Review Score with grade
  • ERA 2025 Compliance Dashboard (8 requirements, pass/fail/warning)
  • Equality Act 2010 Compliance Matrix (9 protected characteristics)
  • Harassment Policy Assessment
  • Equal Pay Analysis
  • Written Particulars Compliance (s.1 ERA 1996) -- 16 required particulars
  • Clause-by-clause analysis sorted by risk
  • Obligations timeline (during employment, on termination, post-termination restrictions)
  • Financial exposure summary (notice pay, redundancy, bonus, holiday, pension, training clawback)
  • Missing protections
  • Prioritised recommendations

Example

bash
/legal employment ./hr/employment-contract-draft.docx

Output filename

EMPLOYMENT-REVIEW-[name]-[date].md


Why use this? You are engaging a contractor (or you are a contractor) and need to know whether HMRC would consider the arrangement to be employment in disguise. Getting this wrong can mean a large unexpected tax bill.

7-factor HMRC CEST-aligned IR35 status determination for contractor and consultancy agreements.

Syntax

bash
/legal ir35 <file>

What it does

Analyses a contractor agreement against seven factors derived from leading case law, each scored on a 5-point scale (+2 Strong Inside to -2 Strong Outside):

#FactorInside indicatorOutside indicator
1ControlClient dictates methods, hours, locationWorker decides how, when, where
2SubstitutionMust perform personally, no substitute rightGenuine unfettered right to send a substitute
3Mutuality of obligationOngoing obligation to provide and accept workProject-by-project, no obligation between engagements
4Financial riskFixed rate, no rework liabilityFixed-price deliverables, bears cost of defects
5Part and parcelClient email, org chart, staff meetingsOwn company branding, visitor access only
6EquipmentClient provides all toolsWorker provides own significant equipment
7ExclusivityCannot work for othersFree to take on other clients

Determination thresholds

Total scoreStatusMeaning
+5 to +14Inside IR35Hallmarks of employment; PAYE applies
-4 to +4BorderlineFinely balanced; professional advice recommended
-14 to -5Outside IR35Genuine self-employment

Case law cross-reference

The assessment is evaluated against:

  • Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions [1968] -- 3-part test
  • Market Investigations v Minister of Social Security [1969] -- "in business on own account"
  • Hall v Lorimer [1994] -- "painting a picture from accumulation of detail"
  • Autoclenz v Belcher [2011] -- sham clauses disregarded
  • Pimlico Plumbers v Smith [2018] -- substitution must be genuine and unfettered

Financial exposure estimate

Calculates the tax exposure if the engagement is determined inside IR35:

  • Lost dividend efficiency for the worker/PSC
  • Additional Income Tax and Employee NICs
  • Employer NICs for the fee-payer (13.8% above threshold)
  • Backdated liability risk (up to 6 years)

Example

bash
/legal ir35 ./contracts/consultancy-agreement.pdf

Output filename

IR35-ASSESSMENT-[party-names]-[date].md

Key legislation

ITEPA 2003 (Chapter 10 -- off-payroll working rules), Companies Act 2006 (small company exemption thresholds).


Why use this? You are a freelancer or contractor who has been sent a contract. You want to know whether the terms are fair, whether you are being misclassified, and what traps to watch out for -- like unlimited revisions, no kill fee, or an overly broad non-compete.

Reviews a contract specifically from the freelancer's perspective, including a Freelancer Bill of Rights checklist.

Syntax

bash
/legal freelancer <file>

What it does

Analyses every clause through 14 critical lenses:

#LensKey concern
1Misclassification riskIR35 red flags
2IP ownershipDefault ownership under CDPA 1988, blanket assignment traps
3Payment termsNet-90+, pay-when-paid, no kill fee
4Kill fee / cancellationCompensation if client terminates early
5Scope creep protectionsChange order process, vague scope language
6Revision limitsUnlimited revisions trap
7Non-competeDuration, geography, activity scope, enforceability
8Non-solicitClient customers, employees, mutuality
9Confidentiality scopeOverly broad definitions, portfolio restrictions
10Liability and indemnificationUncapped liability, one-sided indemnification
11Portfolio usage rightsRight to showcase work
12Insurance requirementsProportionality to project scope
13Tax responsibilitiesSelf Assessment, UTR, PAYE provisions
14Dispute resolutionForced arbitration, distant venue

Freelancer Fairness Score

CategoryWeight
Payment terms and kill fee20%
IP ownership and portfolio rights20%
Scope and revision protections15%
Non-compete / non-solicit15%
Liability and indemnification10%
Misclassification risk10%
Confidentiality scope5%
Dispute resolution5%
ScoreGradeVerdict
85--100AFreelancer-friendly. Sign with confidence.
70--84BMostly fair. Negotiate minor issues.
55--69CMixed. Several terms need negotiation.
40--54DClient-favouring. Significant negotiation needed.
0--39FExploitative. Do not sign without major revisions.

Common traps detected

Unlimited revisions, no kill fee, overly broad non-compete, blanket IP assignment, Net-90+ payment, vague scope, pay-when-paid, one-sided indemnification, no portfolio rights, forced arbitration, pre-existing IP grab, automatic renewal.

Example

bash
/legal freelancer ./contracts/design-contract.pdf

Output filename

FREELANCER-REVIEW-[date].md

Key legislation

ITEPA 2003 (IR35), ERA 1996 (employment status), CDPA 1988 (copyright ownership).

AI Legal UK · The Counsel — Established MMXXVI · Built for England & Wales · Not legal advice.