Skip to content

Specialist Skills

Life does not fit into neat legal categories. These specialist commands handle the situations that fall outside standard contract review -- from disputes and debt recovery to intellectual property, immigration, and estate planning.

Five commands for dispute resolution, M&A due diligence, intellectual property, debt recovery, and wills and probate. Each command produces a scored assessment report with detailed recommendations under England and Wales law.

Specialist hub (broadsheet rebrand) — five fields, one panel

Plate I — the broadsheet rebrand.

Five specialist legal analysis areas

Plate I.a — the original, kept for reference.

Why use this? You are in a disagreement that might end up in court, or you want to check whether a contract has proper dispute resolution provisions. This command assesses your position, checks limitation periods (miss the deadline and your claim is gone), and recommends the best route -- mediation, arbitration, or litigation.

Dispute resolution analysis covering CPR pre-action protocols, ADR enforceability, arbitration, limitation periods, fixed recoverable costs, and Part 36 offers.

Syntax

bash
/legal dispute <file>

Document Types Accepted

Document TypeKey Indicators
Contract with DR clausesArbitration clause, mediation clause, jurisdiction clause, escalation procedure
ADR agreementMediation agreement, arbitration agreement, expert determination agreement
Pre-action letterLetter before claim, letter of response, Part 36 offer
Arbitration agreementSeat of arbitration, arbitral institution, number of arbitrators
Settlement agreementTomlin order, consent order, full and final settlement, release of claims
Jurisdiction agreementExclusive/non-exclusive jurisdiction, service of process

Assessment Frameworks

The analysis is scored across six weighted frameworks:

FrameworkWeightWhat Is Assessed
Pre-Action Protocols (CPR)20%Correct protocol identified, letter of claim requirements, response timelines, ADR consideration, document disclosure, expert evidence
ADR Clauses25%Mediation provisions, Arbitration Act 1996 compliance (seat, rules, confidentiality), expert determination, escalation procedures, enforceability
Fixed Recoverable Costs10%FRC regime applicability (up to 100k), complexity band assignment (1--4), disbursement limits
Limitation Periods25%Primary limitation under Limitation Act 1980 (6yr contract, 12yr deed, 3yr PI), latent damage (s.14A), date of knowledge, standstill agreements
Jurisdiction & Enforcement10%Exclusive vs non-exclusive jurisdiction, Hague Convention compliance, service out of jurisdiction, foreign judgment enforcement
Costs Provisions10%QOCS, Part 36 offers (21-day relevant period, consequences of failing to beat), costs budgeting, indemnity vs standard basis, Calderbank offers

Part 36 Consequences

A valid Part 36 offer that the opponent fails to beat at trial triggers automatic consequences: for a claimant's rejected offer, the defendant faces indemnity costs, enhanced interest (up to 10% above base rate), and an additional amount (up to 75,000 pounds). These are assessed automatically.

Limitation Is Fatal

Limitation carries 25% weight because it is a complete defence. If the limitation period has expired, the claim is extinguished regardless of merits. The analysis flags expiring and expired periods prominently.

Scoring

Each check item within a framework is scored as Pass (full points), Warning (half points), Fail (0 points), or N/A (excluded). The overall Dispute Resolution Assessment Score (0--100) is the weighted aggregate.

GradeScoreMeaning
A90--100Robust dispute resolution framework
B75--89Good with minor gaps
C60--74Moderate gaps requiring attention
D40--59Significant dispute resolution risks
F0--39Critical deficiencies -- urgent action required

Priority Classification

PriorityCriteriaExamples
🔴 CriticalActive legal exposure; loss of claim or unenforceable clauseLimitation expired, arbitration clause void for uncertainty, no PAP compliance
🟡 HighSignificant gap; address within 14 daysPart 36 offer technically invalid, inadequate ADR enforceability
🟡 MediumImportant but not immediately irrecoverableIncomplete costs budgeting, asymmetric jurisdiction clause
🟢 LowBest practice improvementsNo Calderbank strategy, mediation clause could be strengthened

Key Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Parts 36, 44--47
  • Arbitration Act 1996
  • Limitation Act 1980
  • Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005
  • Senior Courts Act 1981

Key Case Law

  • Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] EWCA Civ 576 (ADR refusal and costs)
  • Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil CBC [2023] EWCA Civ 1416 (courts can order ADR)
  • Walford v Miles [1992] 1 AC 128 (agreement to negotiate unenforceable)
  • Cable & Wireless v IBM [2002] EWHC 2059 (defined ADR process enforceable)
  • Enka v Chubb [2020] UKSC 38 (governing law of arbitration agreement)

Example

bash
/legal dispute ./contracts/distribution-agreement.pdf

Output

DISPUTE-RESOLUTION-REVIEW-[identifier]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md

The report includes a scorecard, executive summary, limitation period tracker, costs risk assessment, gap analysis table, framework detail sections, recommended clause amendments, and a remediation roadmap with immediate/weekly/monthly action items.


Why use this? You are buying or investing in a business and need to know what documents are missing from the data room, what red flags to worry about, and whether the deal is ready to complete. This runs a 60-item checklist across corporate, financial, commercial, employment, property, IP, regulatory, and litigation categories.

M&A due diligence gap analysis with a 60-item checklist across 8 categories and traffic-light status per category.

Syntax

bash
/legal due-diligence <file>

Transaction Types

TypeKey Indicators
Share purchaseShare purchase agreement, completion accounts, warranty and indemnity provisions
Asset purchaseAsset schedules, novation of contracts, TUPE transfer
MergerScheme of arrangement, court-sanctioned process, shareholder circulars
MBO/MBIManagement equity participation, vendor loan notes, ratchet provisions
Joint ventureJV agreement, deadlock provisions, exit mechanisms
InvestmentSubscription agreement, anti-dilution provisions, drag/tag rights

Due Diligence Checklist (60 Items, 8 Categories)

#CategoryWeightItemsKey Documents
1Corporate20%9 items (C1--C9)Certificate of incorporation, articles of association, shareholder register, PSC register, board minutes (3 years), director service contracts, group structure chart
2Financial20%9 items (F1--F9)Audited accounts (3 years), management accounts, aged debtors/creditors, bank facilities, charges register, tax computations, HMRC correspondence
3Commercial15%7 items (CO1--CO7)Material contracts (over 50k or 12+ months), top 10 customer and supplier contracts, distribution/agency agreements, change of control schedule
4Employment15%8 items (E1--E8)Employee list with terms, pension arrangements, bonus/incentive schemes, tribunal claims, settlement agreements, collective agreements, TUPE analysis, key person dependencies
5Property10%7 items (P1--P7)Title deeds, leases, planning permissions, environmental reports, building surveys, rates assessments, service charge budgets
6IP10%8 items (IP1--IP8)Patent/trade mark/design registrations, unregistered IP, domain names, software licences, open-source audit, IP assignments from employees/contractors
7Regulatory5%6 items (R1--R6)Licences and permits, regulatory correspondence, GDPR/UK GDPR compliance, H&S records, insurance policies, compliance certifications
8Litigation5%6 items (L1--L6)Current and threatened claims, regulatory investigations, settlement agreements, court orders, unsatisfied judgments

Weight Adjustment

Category weights are adjusted based on the target business. For technology companies, IP weight increases. For regulated entities, regulatory weight increases. For real estate businesses, property weight increases.

Status Indicators

StatusSymbolMeaning
ProvidedDocument appears to have been provided
MissingDocument is not provided and not referenced
Incomplete⚠️Document is partially provided, outdated, or requires further information
N/A--Not applicable to this transaction type

Criticality Levels

CriticalityTransaction Impact
🔴 EssentialTransaction may not complete; may require specific indemnity; W&I insurer may refuse cover
🟡 ImportantMay delay completion; may affect valuation or require escrow
🟢 Nice to HaveUnlikely to delay completion; can be addressed post-completion

Red Flag Categories

The analysis automatically flags red flags in these categories:

  • Title defects -- gaps in share ownership chain, unresolved charges
  • Financial irregularities -- qualified audit opinions, going concern doubts
  • Change of control risk -- material contracts with termination rights
  • Employment exposure -- unfunded pension liabilities, TUPE non-compliance
  • Regulatory risk -- lapsed licences, open investigations, data breaches
  • Litigation exposure -- material claims, unsatisfied CCJs
  • IP deficiencies -- gaps in ownership chain, open-source GPL contamination
  • Environmental liability -- contaminated land, outstanding remediation

Key Legislation

  • Companies Act 2006 (corporate documents, director duties, charges)
  • Employment Rights Act 1996 (employment terms, unfair dismissal)
  • TUPE Regulations 2006 (transfer of undertakings)
  • Enterprise Act 2002 (merger control)
  • UK GDPR / Data Protection Act 2018

Example

bash
/legal due-diligence ./dataroom/index.pdf

Output

DUE-DILIGENCE-GAP-ANALYSIS-[identifier]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md

The report includes a readiness scorecard (grade A--F), executive summary, full gap analysis table (60 items), red flags section, category detail tables, missing documents priority schedule (essential/important/nice-to-have), W&I insurance considerations, and an estimated completion timeline.


Why use this? You need to check who actually owns the intellectual property in a contract -- whether that is copyright, patents, trade marks, or trade secrets. This is especially important if you are licensing software, hiring contractors to create work, or dealing with AI-generated content where ownership rules are unclear.

Intellectual property review and protection assessment.

Syntax

bash
/legal ip <file>

Document Types

  • IP licence agreements (exclusive / non-exclusive / sole)
  • IP assignment deeds
  • Trade mark licences and co-existence agreements
  • Patent licences
  • Software licences (SaaS, on-premise, open source)
  • Employment and consultancy IP clauses
  • Confidentiality / NDA with IP provisions
  • IP portfolio summaries and due diligence reports

Analysis Framework

AreaLegislationWhat Is Assessed
CopyrightCDPA 1988Ownership (s.11 -- employer vs contractor), assignment requirements (s.90), moral rights and waivers (s.87), duration, fair dealing
PatentsPatents Act 1977Employee inventions (ss.39--43), patent validity, infringement risk, supplementary protection certificates
Trade marksTrade Marks Act 1994Registration status, distinctiveness, infringement risk, passing off, co-existence
Trade secretsTrade Secrets Regs 2018Adequacy of confidentiality protections, springboard injunctions, reasonable steps requirement
AI-generated worksCDPA 1988 s.9(3)Computer-generated works ownership, training data rights, AI inventorship (Thaler v Comptroller-General DABUS ruling)
Open sourceVarious licencesCopyleft contamination risk (GPL, AGPL), licence compatibility, FOSS compliance obligations

AI-Generated Works

Section 9(3) CDPA 1988 provides that for computer-generated works, the author is "the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken." This creates significant uncertainty for AI-generated content. The analysis flags this risk for any IP provisions touching AI output.

Employee vs Contractor IP

Under s.11 CDPA 1988, copyright in works created by employees in the course of employment belongs to the employer automatically. For contractors, ownership must be expressly assigned -- it does not vest automatically in the commissioning party. Missing contractor IP assignments are flagged as critical gaps.

Scored Output

DimensionScore RangeWhat It Measures
IP ownership clarity0--100Chain of title, assignment completeness, employee/contractor coverage
Licence terms adequacy0--100Scope, territory, exclusivity, sublicensing, termination provisions
Risk of infringement0--100Third-party IP exposure, freedom to operate, indemnification
Commercial protection0--100Warranties, indemnities, restrictive covenants, non-compete enforceability

Key Legislation

  • Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA)
  • Patents Act 1977
  • Trade Marks Act 1994
  • Registered Designs Act 1949
  • Trade Secrets (Enforcement, etc.) Regulations 2018

Example

bash
/legal ip ./contracts/software-licence.pdf

Output

IP-REVIEW-[name]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md

The report includes an overall IP Protection Score (0--100, grade A--F), ownership analysis, licence terms assessment, risk assessment table, clause-by-clause analysis with risk scores, and prioritised recommendations with replacement language.


Why use this? Someone owes you money and you want to know the best way to get it back -- or you have received a debt claim and need to understand your position. This command checks limitation periods, calculates interest owed, and recommends the most cost-effective enforcement route for your situation.

Debt recovery and enforcement review.

Syntax

bash
/legal debt <file>

Document Types

  • Letters before action / letters of claim
  • County Court claims (N1 form, Particulars of Claim)
  • Statutory demands (s.123 Insolvency Act 1986)
  • Payment plans and instalment agreements
  • Personal guarantees
  • Deeds of settlement / compromise agreements
  • Charging order applications
  • Writs of control / warrants of execution
  • Third-party debt orders

Analysis Framework

Pre-Action Protocol Compliance

RequirementDetail
Sufficient informationDebt amount, basis of claim, interest calculation provided to debtor
Response period30 days for business debtors, 14 days for individuals
ADR considerationGenuine consideration of alternative dispute resolution
ProportionalityClaim proportionate to the amount owed

Limitation Period Check (Limitation Act 1980)

Cause of ActionPeriodSection
Simple contract6 years from breachs.5
Deed12 years from breachs.8
Personal injury3 years from injury/knowledges.11
Acknowledgement/part payment restartResets clockss.29--30

Time-Barred Debts

A debt that has passed its limitation period is unrecoverable through the courts. The analysis prominently flags debts at risk of becoming time-barred and calculates the exact expiry date.

Interest Calculation

TypeRateAuthority
B2B statutory interest8% + Bank of England base rateLate Payment of Commercial Debts Act 1998
County Court interest8% simpleCounty Court Act 1984 s.69
Contractual interestAs stated in the contractSubject to unfair terms assessment
B2B fixed compensation40--100 pounds depending on debt sizeLate Payment Act 1998

Enforcement Route Recommendations

Debt AmountDebtor TypeRecommended Route
Under 10,000 poundsAnySmall claims track, Money Claim Online
10,000--25,000 poundsAnyFast track
Over 25,000 poundsAnyMulti-track or High Court enforcement
Over 750 poundsCompanyStatutory demand, winding-up petition
Over 5,000 poundsIndividualStatutory demand, bankruptcy petition
Any with propertyAnyCharging order on property
Employed debtorIndividualAttachment of earnings
Debtor with bank accountAnyThird-party debt order
Debtor with goodsAnyWrit of control (High Court) or warrant of execution (County Court)

Consumer Debt Protections

ProtectionLegislationWhat It Covers
CCA 1974 complianceConsumer Credit Act 1974Regulated agreements, default notices, unfair relationships
FCA debt collectionCONC 7Fair treatment, communication frequency, vulnerable customers
Breathing spaceDebt Respite Scheme60-day moratorium on enforcement, interest, and charges
Administration orderCounty Court Act 1984Court-managed repayment for debts under 5,000 pounds
IVAInsolvency Act 1986Individual Voluntary Arrangement as alternative to bankruptcy

B2B Late Payment

For business-to-business debts, the Late Payment of Commercial Debts Act 1998 provides a statutory entitlement to 8% above the Bank of England base rate, plus fixed compensation of 40 pounds (debt under 1,000), 70 pounds (debt 1,000--9,999.99), or 100 pounds (debt 10,000+). The analysis calculates the total automatically.

Key Legislation

  • Limitation Act 1980
  • Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998
  • Civil Procedure Rules (CPR)
  • Insolvency Act 1986
  • Consumer Credit Act 1974

Example

bash
/legal debt ./correspondence/letter-before-action.pdf

Output

DEBT-REVIEW-[debtor]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md

The report includes a claim summary (creditor, debtor, principal, interest, total), overall strength score (0--100, grade A--F), pre-action compliance table, limitation period tracker with expiry date and status, recommended recovery route with estimated costs and timeline, risk factors, and a step-by-step action plan with deadlines.


Why use this? You want to check whether a will is properly drafted and legally valid, understand the inheritance tax position, or identify who might have a claim against the estate. This is useful whether you are drafting a new will, reviewing an existing one, or dealing with probate.

Wills and probate document review.

Syntax

bash
/legal wills <file>

Document Types

  • Wills (simple, mirror, mutual)
  • Codicils
  • Letters of wishes
  • Lasting Powers of Attorney (Property & Financial Affairs, Health & Welfare)
  • Grant of Probate / Letters of Administration applications
  • IHT400 / IHT205 (inheritance tax returns)
  • Deeds of Variation (s.142 IHTA 1984)
  • Trust deeds (lifetime, will trust, discretionary, interest in possession)

Analysis Framework

Wills Act 1837 Compliance (s.9 Execution Requirements)

RequirementWhat Is Checked
Testamentary capacityBanks v Goodfellow [1870] four-part test: understands nature of will-making, knows extent of estate, aware of moral claims, free from delusion
Knowledge and approvalTestator understood and approved the contents of the will
Execution (s.9)Signed by testator (or at direction), in the presence of 2 witnesses who both attest
Witness independenceBeneficiary witness rule (s.15) -- gift to a witness or their spouse is void
Attestation clausePresent, adequate, and confirms s.9 compliance
Revocation clauseExpress revocation of all prior wills and codicils

The Golden Rule

Following Kenward v Adams [1975], where there is any doubt about the testator's capacity (especially the elderly or seriously ill), a medical practitioner should examine the testator and record their opinion on capacity. The analysis flags high-risk capacity situations.

Substantive Review

  • Executor appointments (professional vs lay, number, substitutes)
  • Guardian appointments for minor children
  • Specific gifts and pecuniary legacies
  • Residuary estate disposition
  • Trust provisions (age contingencies, trustee powers, class gifts)
  • Survivorship clauses (28-day standard)
  • Digital assets provisions
  • Funeral wishes

Inheritance Tax Planning (IHTA 1984)

Relief/AllowanceAmount/RateConditions
Nil-rate band (NRB)325,000 poundsAvailable to all estates
Residence nil-rate band (RNRB)175,000 poundsMust leave a qualifying residential interest to a direct descendant; tapered withdrawal for estates over 2m pounds
Transferable NRBUp to 100% of deceased spouse's unused NRBSpouse/civil partner must have died first without fully using their NRB
Transferable RNRBUp to 100% of deceased spouse's unused RNRBSame conditions as transferable NRB
Business Property Relief (BPR)50% or 100%Relevant business property held for 2+ years; 100% for unquoted shares, business, interest in business; 50% for quoted shares giving control, land/buildings/machinery used by partnership/company
Agricultural Property Relief (APR)50% or 100%Agricultural property occupied for 2+ years (owner-occupier) or 7 years (let); 100% if vacant possession or let on tenancy beginning after 1 Sept 1995
Charity exemption40% to 36% rate reductionReduced rate of 36% (instead of 40%) if 10%+ of baseline amount left to charity
Potentially Exempt TransfersFull exemption after 7 yearsTaper relief applies between 3--7 years

Maximum Combined Allowance

A married couple or civil partners can combine their allowances for a potential maximum of 1,000,000 pounds free of IHT (2 x 325,000 NRB + 2 x 175,000 RNRB), provided the RNRB conditions are met.

Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975

The analysis assesses claim risk from potential applicants:

Applicant CategoryTest Applied
Surviving spouse/civil partnerSuch financial provision as is reasonable in all circumstances (higher standard)
Former spouse (not remarried)Reasonable financial provision for maintenance
Cohabitant (2+ years before death)Reasonable financial provision for maintenance
Child of the deceasedReasonable financial provision for maintenance
Person treated as child of familyReasonable financial provision for maintenance
Person maintained by the deceasedReasonable financial provision for maintenance

LPA Compliance (Mental Capacity Act 2005)

  • Certificate provider requirements
  • Named persons to be notified
  • Restrictions and conditions
  • Registration with the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG)
  • Capacity presumption and best interests principles

Key Legislation

  • Wills Act 1837
  • Administration of Estates Act 1925
  • Inheritance Tax Act 1984 (IHTA)
  • Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
  • Mental Capacity Act 2005
  • Trustee Act 2000

Key Case Law

  • Banks v Goodfellow [1870] LR 5 QB 549 (testamentary capacity test)
  • Kenward v Adams [1975] (golden rule for capacity assessment)

Example

bash
/legal wills ./estate/will-draft.pdf

Output

WILL-REVIEW-[testator]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md

The report includes an overall validity score (0--100, grade A--F), execution compliance table (Wills Act 1837), estate distribution summary, IHT estimate with available reliefs and estimated liability, Inheritance Act 1975 claim risk assessment (high/medium/low with identified potential claimants and defensive measures), and prioritised recommendations with replacement language.

AI Legal UK · The Counsel — Established MMXXVI · Built for England & Wales · Not legal advice.