Skip to content

Business Intelligence

Most legal work is not a single document in isolation -- it is a matter that accumulates contracts, prior reviews, redlines, and deadlines over weeks. These commands sit one level up from clause analysis: they consolidate, benchmark, and report across everything in a matter so a partner, a board, or a client can see the whole picture at a glance.

Five commands. One is documented in full here -- /legal matter-brief, the state-of-the-matter consolidator. The other four already live under their natural home categories and are summarised below with links.

State-of-the-matter brief consolidating legal posture across every document, prior review, deadline, and outstanding redline for a single matter.

Why use this? A partner walks into a client call in fifteen minutes and needs the whole matter in one page -- where it sits, the dominant risk, what is blocking progress, and what to do next. This command does not re-analyse the contracts; it folds every prior /legal review, every open redline, and every deadline into one crisp, action-oriented briefing pack written in a senior associate's voice.

Syntax

bash
/legal matter-brief <matter>

The <matter> argument resolves three ways, so the same skill works whether you run it inside a hosted matter store or from a plain working directory:

Input sourceWhat you passHow it resolves
Matter idA reference the host can look upThe host pre-loads a structured dossier (matter, documents, reviews, deadlines) and hands it to the skill
Matter dossierPasted text describing the matter, parties, documents, prior findings, and known deadlinesParsed directly as the dossier
Folder pathA directory full of contracts and prior /legal review outputsEach file is treated as a document; lightweight inline summarisation runs in place of consolidated review findings

The skill is host-agnostic: it does not define how the data is fetched, only the shape of the dossier it consumes and the brief it produces. Any field it cannot find is marked Unknown rather than invented.

What it consolidates

The brief is built in phases, each becoming a section of the final pack:

PhaseWhat it produces
Phase 0 -- Escalation checkRuns first. Scans for active litigation, regulator action, a personal-data breach affecting 100+ subjects, criminal-liability exposure, an imminent limitation period (under 30 days), director personal liability, or a whistleblowing disclosure
Phase 1 -- Matter contextTitle, reference, type, stage, counterparty, effective date, key dates, governing law, open/closed status -- confirmed England and Wales
Phase 2 -- Document inventoryOne row per document, sorted most-recent-first; documents referenced elsewhere but not provided are listed as referenced -- not provided so they can be chased
Phase 3 -- Prior review consolidationFolds every prior deep-skill output into outstanding 🔴 HIGH risks, 🟡 MEDIUM risks, resolved/mitigated items, and negotiation status (on the table / counterparty agreed / unresolved)
Phase 4 -- Deadlines and ticklerEvery deadline sorted soonest-first; inside 14 days is flagged URGENT, inside 30 days near-term, and past deadlines stay marked MISSED so nothing silently slips
Phase 5 -- Recommended next movePartner-voice: where we are, three verb-led actions each with an owner and a date, and issues to escalate

Escalation runs first

If the dossier contains any escalation trigger -- a claim form, a Part 36 offer, a regulator enquiry, an imminent limitation deadline, or a director-liability signal -- the brief prepends an ESCALATE -- INSTRUCT A SOLICITOR NOW banner above the standard disclaimer and names the specific trigger. AI consolidation is not a substitute for qualified advice on those signals.

It consolidates, it does not re-review

The brief deduplicates findings across reviews and keeps the highest severity rating; it does not re-run clause analysis. If a document has no prior review, the brief says so plainly and recommends running /legal review before the next partner check-in rather than guessing at risks.

Risk consolidation

Only 🔴 HIGH and 🟡 MEDIUM risks reach the partner's pack -- clause-level noise is deliberately left out. Each risk row carries its source document, the source review and date, a one-line "why it matters", and an owner.

BucketWhat it holds
🔴 Outstanding HIGHLive exposure across all documents, deduplicated, highest severity retained
🟡 Outstanding MEDIUMImportant but not immediately irrecoverable issues
🟢 Resolved or mitigatedCounter-drafted, waived, indemnified, or accepted by the client, with resolution date
Negotiation statusItem, our position, their position, status (agreed / rejected / open / parked)

If the matter touches Scots, Northern Irish, or foreign law, that is surfaced as a HIGH risk and the brief continues on the England and Wales elements only.

Use cases

ScenarioWhat the brief gives you
Partner check-inA one-page state-of-play to walk into a supervision meeting without re-reading the file
Client updatePlain-English "where we are" and "what happens next", owners and dates attached
Pre-meeting prepThe dominant risk, the nearest deadline, and the unresolved items needing a decision, ready fifteen minutes out

Example

bash
/legal matter-brief ./matters/project-aurora/

Output

MATTER-BRIEF-[matter-ref]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md

The brief opens with the standard disclaimer (preceded by the escalation banner where triggered), then a matter header table, an executive summary written in editorial broadsheet voice, the document inventory, the risk consolidation tables, the negotiation status, the deadlines tickler, and the load-bearing Recommended Next Move -- one paragraph on where the matter sits and three dated, owned actions. The brief is a living document: each run replaces the previous one.


The rest of the suite

The other four Business Intelligence commands are documented in full under their natural home categories. Short summaries and links below.

Compares every contract clause against England and Wales market-standard positions -- 80+ clause benchmarks across 14 contract types, with a favourability assessment per clause. Use it to answer "is this term normal, or is the counterparty pushing?" before you negotiate.

→ Full walkthrough: /legal benchmark

M&A due-diligence gap analysis: a 60-item checklist across eight categories (corporate, financial, commercial, employment, property, IP, regulatory, litigation), with traffic-light status per item and a readiness scorecard. Tells you what is missing from the data room and whether the deal is ready to complete.

→ Full walkthrough: /legal due-diligence

Generates Companies Act 2006 compliant board documents -- minutes, board and written resolutions, conflict declarations, director appointments, dividend approvals, and share allotments -- from a short brief. A generation command, not a review.

→ Full walkthrough: /legal board-pack

Builds a 12-month regulatory filing calendar from a company profile, with Companies House, HMRC, ICO, FCA, and SRA deadlines, penalties for late filing, advance-warning windows, and a delegation matrix. The skill checks what is actually in force so the calendar reflects live obligations rather than assumed ones.

→ Full walkthrough: /legal regulatory-calendar


See also the statutes these commands lean on in the legislation reference.

AI Legal UK · The Counsel — Established MMXXVI · Built for England & Wales · Not legal advice.